Dealing with the chaos, fear and danger of a major contingency relies on preparation and knowledge. Those charged with managing such crises must have the training to understand the unique challenges that crop up when the normal operation of society are interrupted. As with most things human, coherent discourse is essential to action, and that depends in large part to emergency communication equipment.
The animal kingdom has a number of species which form societal groups which rely on the ability of their leader to keep them safe. A pride of lions depends on the large male to fend of other encroaching males. When the water sources dry up, a parade of elephants follows the oldest female elephant, relying on her memory to find alternate sources of water, humans also set up leaders to guide the population in crises.
Leaders of every community have a responsibility, legal and moral, to prepare for the unknown, to help each group be as ready as possible to survive and recover. Whether a crisis is a natural phenomenon like an earthquake or wildfire, or of human sourcing as in war, preparation is an inherent responsibility of leadership. As human settlements became more complex, it meant that there is much more to prepare for and protect.
Throughout the nation, each community has developed a way to deal with disasters. While information and experience sharing have always been a part of the process of developing contingency response systems, there was no standard way of getting things done. Some organizations, both public and private, also have set methods for dealing with contingencies.
Often people who will be tasked to help in a crisis have other jobs on which they spend most of their time. When it comes time to respond to a disaster and they are pressed into service, their skills and experience can make the difference in mitigating damage, injury and fatalities. They need the specialized training to deal with the decidedly unorthodox situations catastrophes make them face.
A number of private companies and some governmental agencies have developed their own courses of instruction. Each military organization, for example, holds a required number of exercises each year designed to test the leadership and resources of the organization in the aftermath of a number of different contingencies. The process was different for each service, just as it was for each city or private organization.
When something happens which requires a full blown response for these individual organizations, their training and exercise experience helped them make the best response and recovery possible, minimizing damage, injury and loss of life. But when the event that occurs is beyond the assets or expertise of the organization, they would have to ask for help outside their group. This is when the response system began to fail, or at the least function more poorly.
After recent enormous disasters like the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma, a national effort to resolve the problems of coordination began. The resulting national incident management system has made it easier for communities to work together. At the center of this system is the ability to make each group able to talk together, a benefit of standardized emergency communication equipment.
The animal kingdom has a number of species which form societal groups which rely on the ability of their leader to keep them safe. A pride of lions depends on the large male to fend of other encroaching males. When the water sources dry up, a parade of elephants follows the oldest female elephant, relying on her memory to find alternate sources of water, humans also set up leaders to guide the population in crises.
Leaders of every community have a responsibility, legal and moral, to prepare for the unknown, to help each group be as ready as possible to survive and recover. Whether a crisis is a natural phenomenon like an earthquake or wildfire, or of human sourcing as in war, preparation is an inherent responsibility of leadership. As human settlements became more complex, it meant that there is much more to prepare for and protect.
Throughout the nation, each community has developed a way to deal with disasters. While information and experience sharing have always been a part of the process of developing contingency response systems, there was no standard way of getting things done. Some organizations, both public and private, also have set methods for dealing with contingencies.
Often people who will be tasked to help in a crisis have other jobs on which they spend most of their time. When it comes time to respond to a disaster and they are pressed into service, their skills and experience can make the difference in mitigating damage, injury and fatalities. They need the specialized training to deal with the decidedly unorthodox situations catastrophes make them face.
A number of private companies and some governmental agencies have developed their own courses of instruction. Each military organization, for example, holds a required number of exercises each year designed to test the leadership and resources of the organization in the aftermath of a number of different contingencies. The process was different for each service, just as it was for each city or private organization.
When something happens which requires a full blown response for these individual organizations, their training and exercise experience helped them make the best response and recovery possible, minimizing damage, injury and loss of life. But when the event that occurs is beyond the assets or expertise of the organization, they would have to ask for help outside their group. This is when the response system began to fail, or at the least function more poorly.
After recent enormous disasters like the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma, a national effort to resolve the problems of coordination began. The resulting national incident management system has made it easier for communities to work together. At the center of this system is the ability to make each group able to talk together, a benefit of standardized emergency communication equipment.
About the Author:
Read more about Disaster Preparedness Centers On Emergency Communication Equipment visiting our website.
No comments:
Post a Comment